I don't know who "won" or who "loss". Yes, Drumpf was erratic most of the time and in that sense, maybe Clinton "won". But is that really a way to anoint someone actively seeking the Presidency when they too suck? He was unhinged and she was smug and did a lot of the attacking herself. I think that cancels each other out. What I didn't like or appreciate is the fact that Lester Holt was clearly pro-Clinton. Seriously, no questions about her Email / Server (barely), Benghazi, or the Clinton Foundation? Sure, Drumpf could and should have brought this up on his own. He loss there. But the idea that a moderator would not ask any questions pertaining to the 3 BIGGEST issues tied to Clinton is asinine. Now with that said, I'm even more confused as to who won based on which network is on air or the comments at various news outlet. So, since I can't get a clear idea of who won, I come here to ask you guys who you think won. At the end of the day.....they still both suck. One last thing, Drumpf better get serious for Debate #2 and actually do mock debates based on the fact that he was all over the map tonight and searching for things to talk about. Had he actually done the work before tonight, he could have easily mopped the floor with her based on a handful of comments Clinton made. But with no prep, he was constantly trying to ad lib stuff that made no sense to what she had brought up.