Well you can absolutely tell that 2 out of the 3 guys are raving fanboys of the COD franchise. The guy in the middle seems to be the only one that sees fault with the game. The other 2 have obviously never spent any time at all with either Battlefield Bad Company 2 or Battlefield 3. The guy on the left looks to be almost offended when the middle guy criticizes the story aspects. Its funny that in a review of a game they go straight into praising the game for the same stuff Activision has been force feeding gamers for the last 4 installments of COD. The engine is the same as MW2, the character models, the guns, the sound, and the story, all the same. The only thing that I've heard that they changed was the tightening up of the Spec Ops mode and they added new perks. Perks that make the MP much easier for the people that put a ton of time into the MP. While I'm sure the single player is "AMAZING" I find it hard to believe anything that obvious fanboys like these guys say.

Just looking at the G4 2011 Best games of the year "Death match" they do at the end of the year they had MW3 against BF3 in the first round and BF3 won. Then theres this from the readers and staff at IGN.

http://www.ign.com/videos/2011/11/21/modern-warfare-3-vs-battlefield-3-the-results